Early intranasal medication administration in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: Two randomized simulation trials

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIntranasal medications have been proposed as adjuncts to out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care. We sought to quantify the effects of intranasal medication administration (INMA) in OHCA workflows.MethodsWe conducted separate randomized OHCA simulation trials with lay rescuers (LRs) and first responders (FRs). Participants were randomized to groups performing hands‐only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/automated external defibrillator with or without INMA during the second analysis phase. Time to compression following the second shock (CPR2) was the primary outcome and compression quality (chest compression rate (CCR) and fraction (CCF)) was the secondary outcome. We fit linear regression models adjusted for CPR training in the LR group and service years in the FR group.ResultsAmong LRs, INMA was associated with a significant increase in CPR2 (mean diff. 44.1 s, 95% CI: 14.9, 73.3), which persisted after adjustment (p = 0.005). We observed a significant decrease in CCR (INMA 95.1 compressions per min (cpm) vs control 104.2 cpm, mean diff. −9.1 cpm, 95% CI −16.6, −1.6) and CCF (INMA 62.4% vs control 69.8%, mean diff. −7.5%, 95% CI −12.0, −2.9). Among FRs, we found no significant CPR2 delays (mean diff. −2.1 s, 95% CI −15.9, 11.7), which persisted after adjustment (p = 0.704), or difference in quality (CCR INMA 115.5 cpm vs control 120.8 cpm, mean diff. −5.3 cpm, 95% CI −12.6, 2.0; CCF INMA 79.6% vs control 81.2% mean diff. −1.6%, 95% CI −7.4, 4.3%)ConclusionsINMA in LR resuscitation was associated with diminished resuscitation performance. INMA by FR did not impede key times or quality.