Balance Error Scoring System in the assessment of chronic ankle stability: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Zheng Shanshan12,Xue Xiao'ao1,Yu Le12,Tao Weichu2,Wang Ru2,Sun Yang1,Hua Yinghui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China

2. School of Exercise and Health Shanghai University of Sport Shanghai China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveChronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common musculoskeletal injury associated with static balance deficits. The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is commonly used to assess static balance in individuals with CAI. However, the sensitivity of BESS in detecting balance deficits in CAI is unknown. This study compared BESS performance between people with CAI and controls and investigated which stances most effectively identified balance deficits in individuals with CAI.Literature SurveySeven electronic databases (Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from July 13, 2023, to September 10, 2023, using the ankle instability and balance related terms as keywords to search original studies and perform a systematic review.MethodsStudies that compared BESS scores between individuals with CAI and healthy controls were systematically identified. Extracted data included study characteristics, participant demographics, and assessment details. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect sizes to compare groups for the BESS components used to assess CAI.ResultsSix studies met the eligibility criteria. The double‐leg foam stance yielded an SMD of −0.02 (95% CI: −0.32 to 0.29), with an I2 value of 3.5%. Significant differences between groups were noted in the single foam (SMD = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.33–1.45; I2 = 78.3%) and single firm (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.14–1.10; I2 = 72.1%) performances, although both demonstrated high heterogeneity. Conversely, the tandem foam (SMD = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.51–1.02; I2 = 0.0%) and tandem firm (SMD = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.11–0.68; I2 = 23.8%) performances showed small to moderate between‐group differences with considerably lower heterogeneity.ConclusionThis review indicates that tandem stances on foam and firm surfaces in the BESS are reliable indicators of static balance deficits in individuals with CAI.

Funder

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality

National Natural Science Foundation of China - State Grid Corporation Joint Fund for Smart Grid

Publisher

Wiley

Reference47 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3