Affiliation:
1. Helsinki University Central Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Turuntie 150, 02740 Espoo, Finland
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In this randomized prospective study the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair with either Lichtenstein mesh or the Prolene Hernia System® (PHS) were evaluated.
Methods
Postoperative pain and time to return to work, driving and sporting hobbies were recorded after 300 inguinal hernia repairs done by one of the two methods. Long-term sequelae and complications were assessed at follow-up visits 1 week, 1 month and 1 year after the operation.
Results
The median duration of operation for unilateral primary hernia was 37 min for the Lichtenstein operation and 27 min for the PHS procedure (P < 0·001). Postoperative pain was similar after both operations. Median sick leave was 7 days in both groups. Time to driving a car was 4 versus 3 days, and time to return to sporting hobbies 13 versus 11 days, in the Lichtenstein and PHS groups, respectively. Apart from a residual femoral hernia after Lichtenstein repair, no recurrent inguinal hernias were detected.
Conclusion
Both Lichtenstein and PHS methods resulted in rapid recovery and low recurrence rates. The PHS operation was significantly quicker.
Funder
Research Foundation of Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference23 articles.
1. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of inguinal hernia;Scott;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2002
2. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials;EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration;Br J Surg,2000
3. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair;McCormack;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2003
4. Individualization of hernia repair: a new era;Nyhus;Surgery,1993
5. A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair;Gilbert;Hernia,1999
Cited by
70 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献