Experimental test of the efficacy of hunting for controlling human–wildlife conflict

Author:

Northrup Joseph M.1ORCID,Howe Eric2,Inglis Jeremy3,Newton Erica2,Obbard Martyn E.1ORCID,Pond Bruce1,Potter Derek2

Affiliation:

1. Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University 2140 East Bank Drive Peterborough ON Canada K9L 1Z8

2. Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2140 East Bank Drive Peterborough ON Canada K9L 1Z8

3. Regional Operations Division Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 31 Riverside Drive Pembroke ON Canada K8A 8R6

Abstract

AbstractHuman–wildlife conflict can cause major declines in wildlife populations and pose a threat to human safety and livelihoods. Large carnivores are among the most conflict‐prone species because they range widely, eat human‐associated foods, and can pose a risk to human safety. Legal harvest of carnivores by licensed hunters is an attractive method to attempt to reduce conflict; however, there is mixed evidence for its effectiveness. We leveraged a unique management project in Ontario, Canada in which a new spring American black bear (Ursus americanus) hunting season was implemented in selected wildlife management units in addition to the existing fall season. We examined human–bear interactions and incidents before (2012 and 2013) and after (2014 and 2015) this implementation in treatment and control areas. Further, using data from 2004–2019, we examined the longer‐term patterns of human–bear interactions and incidents before and after this management project when a spring season was implemented throughout the entire province beginning in 2016. Harvest increased significantly upon the implementation of the spring season in selected units, but there was no concomitant reduction in interactions or incidents, and these were higher in areas with the new spring season relative to control areas. Human–bear interactions, incidents, and harvest were strongly related to the availability of natural foods in all analyses. Regulated, presumably sustainable harvest was ineffective at reducing human–bear interactions and incidents in the near‐term and might have increased both. Our results support a long history of research showing that natural food availability is a primary driver of human–wildlife conflict. Programs promoting coexistence between people and wildlife, including education, capacity building, and management of unnatural food sources are likely to be the most successful at reducing conflicts between people and bears.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3