Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA
2. Department of Community, Environment and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA
3. Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Anchorage Alaska USA
Abstract
AbstractUnalaska Island, Alaska, served as a US military base during World War II. The military installed bases on Unalaska and nearby islands, many of which were built adjacent to Unangan communities. The military used toxic compounds in its operations and left a legacy of pollution that may pose health risks to residents and local wildlife. The goals of this study were to identify hotspots of contamination remaining at Unalaska formerly used defense (FUD) sites, evaluate the risk posed by arsenic, and examine “no US Department of Defense action indicated” (NDAI) status determinations for FUD sites near communities. We compiled soil chemistry data from remediation reports prepared by the US Army Corps of Engineers at 18 FUD sites on and near Unalaska. Nine had past and/or active remediation projects and on‐site sampling data. Eight sites did not have sampling data and were characterized as NDAI. One site was listed as closed. For the nine sites with sampling data, we compiled data for 22 contaminants of concern (COC) and compared concentrations to soil cleanup levels for human health (18 AAC 75.341). We mapped contaminant concentrations exceeding these levels to identify hotspots of contamination. We found that concentrations of some of the 22 COC exceeded Alaska cleanup levels despite remediation efforts, including diesel range organics, arsenic, and lead. The highest COC concentrations were at the FUD site adjacent to the City of Unalaska. A quantitative risk assessment for arsenic found that the risk of exposure through drinking water is low. We highlight concerns with NDAI designations and current remedial practices at remote FUD sites located adjacent to communities. Our data suggest the need for further remediation and monitoring efforts on Unalaska for certain contaminants and research to examine potential threats to human and animal health associated with these sites. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1420–1431. © 2024 SETAC
Reference63 articles.
1. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination of subsistence species on Unalaska Island in the Aleutian Archipelago
2. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). (2019).Northeast Cape and Gambell formerly used defense sites. Retrieved January 2 2022 from:https://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/sites/st-lawrence/
3. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). (2021a).18 AAC 75 oil and other hazardous substances pollution control.
4. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). (2021b).Contaminatd sites search. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Spill Prevention and Response. Retrieved November 15 2021 from:https://dec.alaska.gov/Applications/SPAR/PublicMVC/CSP/Search
5. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. (2022).Federal special status species. Retrieved January 30 2022 from:http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=specialstatus.fedendangered