Techniques for navigating postsurgical adhesions: Insights into mechanisms and future directions

Author:

Chen Jiahui1ORCID,Tang Xiaoqi1,Wang Ziyu1,Perez Arielle2ORCID,Yao Benjamin3,Huang Ke45,Zhang Yang1,King Martin W.16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

2. UNC School of Medicine Department of Surgery University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Montefiore Medical Center Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Women's Health Services Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USA

4. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering North Carolina State University & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Raleigh North Carolina USA

5. Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina United States

6. College of Textiles, Donghua University Shanghai Songjiang China

Abstract

AbstractPostsurgical adhesions are a common complication of surgical procedures that can lead to postoperative pain, bowel obstruction, infertility, as well as complications with future procedures. Several agents have been developed to prevent adhesion formation, such as barriers, anti‐inflammatory and fibrinolytic agents. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of physical barrier agents, but they have been associated with conflicting clinical studies and controversy in the clinical utilization of anti‐adhesion barriers. In this review, we summarize the human anatomy of the peritoneum, the pathophysiology of adhesion formation, the current prevention agents, as well as the current research progress on adhesion prevention. The early cellular events starting with injured mesothelial cells and incorporating macrophage response have recently been found to be associated with adhesion formation. This may provide the key component for developing future adhesion prevention methods. The current use of physical barriers to separate tissues, such as Seprafilm®, composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, can only reduce the risk of adhesion formation at the end stage. Other anti‐inflammatory or fibrinolytic agents for preventing adhesions have only been studied within the context of current research models, which is limited by the lack of in‐vitro model systems as well as in‐depth study of in‐vivo models to evaluate the efficiency of anti‐adhesion agents. In addition, we explore emerging therapies, such as gene therapy and stem cell‐based approaches, that may offer new strategies for preventing adhesion formation. In conclusion, anti‐adhesion agents represent a promising approach for reducing the burden of adhesion‐related complications in surgical patients. Further research is needed to optimize their use and develop new therapies for this challenging clinical problem.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

North Carolina Textile Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Biomedical Engineering,Biotechnology

Reference130 articles.

1. Abdominal Adhesion Prevention: Still a Sticky Subject

2. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions‐how big is the problem?;Menzies D;Ann R Coll Surg Engl,1990

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3