Wild lions in small, fenced reserves in South Africa conform to a meta‐population

Author:

Selier Jeanetta12ORCID,Miller Susan M.34ORCID,Coverdale Brent5ORCID,Ferreira Sam67ORCID,Kruger Johan8,Parker Dan M.9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. South African National Biodiversity Institute Pretoria South Africa

2. School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu‐Natal Durban South Africa

3. DSI‐NRF Centre of Excellence FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

4. Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

5. Scientific Services Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Pietermaritzburg South Africa

6. Scientific Services, SANParks Skukuza South Africa

7. Department of Conservation and Marine Sciences Cape Peninsula University of Technology Cape Town South Africa

8. Ecological Services, Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism Polokwane South Africa

9. School of Biology and Environmental Sciences University of Mpumalanga Mbombela South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Lions (Panthera leo) are declining across their range, mainly due to human‐induced habitat fragmentation and prey depletion. However, the South African lion population continues to grow. Unlike other range states, South Africa actively manages wild lions across a continuum of landscapes and ecological constraints. Many of these lions are in small, fenced reserves where managers seek to mimic ecological processes in small landscapes. However, the effectiveness of this management approach has not been evaluated against meta‐population criteria. Given that meta‐population dynamics allows species living in fragmented habitats to persist, we evaluated how South Africa's lion population complies with meta‐population criteria using national audit data between 2010 and 2019 from 49 fenced, wild lion reserves. The small, fenced reserves holding wild lions fulfil the criteria for meta‐population functionality. However, this functionality was achieved through haphazard and uncoordinated management actions and not through a coordinated approach. Our main recommendation is to consider implementing a more coordinated meta‐population management approach. At the very least, meta‐population management guidelines should be reviewed and updated on a regular basis, regular audits should be conducted and periodic genetic evaluation of the meta‐population (every 10 years) should be instituted. We recommend incentivising lion managers to enhance the conservation of lions in South Africa within a meta‐population framework. We also recommend a focus on improving decision making and policy procedures that facilitates compliance with relevant legislation aimed at achieving high levels of lion conservation‐governance efficiency. South Africa's meta‐population approach to wild lion management in small, fenced reserves is effective at conserving lions and contributing to lion conservation more broadly. In an increasingly fragmented landscape, the need for human management actions to ensure persistence of large carnivores is likely to increase. A managed meta‐population approach of fenced (or unfenced, but geographically isolated) populations is a useful tool for conservationists to consider worldwide.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3