Development of a quality of life measure for left ventricular assist device recipients using a mixed methods approach

Author:

Slade Anita L.1ORCID,McMullan Christel123,Haque M. Sayeed4,Griffith Stephen1,Marley Laura5,Quinn David5,O'Hara Margaret E.5,Horton Mike16,Calvert Melanie J.12347,Lim Hoong Sern5,Lane Deirdre A.89

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

2. National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

3. National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision and Cellular Therapeutics University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

4. Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

5. University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK

6. Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK

7. Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

8. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

9. Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients report symptom improvement but find adjusting to life with the LVAD challenging. These challenges are unique, and existing patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) do not reflect their experiences. This study aimed to develop a culturally relevant quality of life PROM for use with LVAD recipients in future research, design evolutions and clinical practice.MethodsA three‐stage mixed‐methods approach was used to develop a PROM: stage 1 included group concept mapping (GCM); stage 2 semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 LVAD recipients and 10 clinicians, and a questionnaire was developed using a conceptual framework; and stage 3 used exploratory psychometric analysis of the PROM data using Rasch measurement theory. This paper presents stages 2 and 3.ResultsThe conceptual framework consisted of four key concepts, including general health, life with the LVAD, equipment and clothing and emotional impact. Statements from interviews and GCM were used to create items for the LVAD quality of life (LVAD‐QoL). Cognitive interviews tested face validity and participant comprehension. Forty‐nine participants were recruited from three UK transplant centres. PROM data were collected and analysed using Rasch analysis. Four items displayed misfit; dependency between item sets was the biggest issue (57/485 pairwise differences). After restructuring and dealing with item misfit, the LVAD‐QoL conformed to the Rasch model, supporting the psychometric properties and quality of the LVAD‐QoL.ConclusionsUsing a mixed‐methods approach ensured the development of a robust and psychometrically sound tool for research, design evolution and clinical practice with LVAD recipients.

Funder

British Heart Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3