Geographic disparities in thyroid cancer staging at presentation: Insights from an Australian context

Author:

Yang Zihao M.1ORCID,Tong Chai W.2,Bhimani Nazim13,O’Neill Christine J.4,Lai Christine S. L.5,Serpell Jonathan W.6,Glover Anthony R.13

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and Northern Clinical School University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. St George Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine The Kinghorn Cancer Centre Garvan Institute of Medical Research St. Vincent's Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

5. Discipline of Surgery University of Adelaide and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia

6. Endocrine Surgical Unit The Alfred Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThyroid cancer diagnoses have increased over recent decades at a rate much higher than that of any other cancer in Australia. Rural patients are known to have reduced access to healthcare and may have different thyroid cancer presentation rates. This study examined the relationship between thyroid cancer diagnosis and patient rurality.MethodsData from the Australia and New Zealand Thyroid Cancer Registry from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed, stratifying patient postcodes into rurality groups using the Australian Statistical Geography Standard. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were used to stratify risk categories and management to compare treatment adequacy between the groups. Statistical analysis assessed demographic, clinical, and management differences.ResultsAmong 1766 patients, 70.6% were metropolitan (metro) and 29.4% were non‐metropolitan (non‐metro). Non‐metro patients were older at diagnosis (median 56 vs. 50 years, p < 0.001), presented more frequently with T stage greater than 1 (stage 2–4, 41.9% vs. 34.8%, and p = 0.005), AJCC stage greater than 1 (stage 2–4, 18.5% vs. 14.6%, and p = 0.019), and cancers larger than 4 cm (14.3% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005). No significant differences in treatment adequacy were observed between the groups for ATA low‐risk cancers.ConclusionsNon‐metropolitan patients in the registry present with more advanced thyroid cancer, possibly due to differences in healthcare access. Further research should assess long‐term survival outcomes and influencing factors. Understanding the impact on patient outcomes and addressing healthcare access barriers can optimize thyroid cancer care across geographic regions in Australia.

Funder

Cancer Institute NSW

Publisher

Wiley

Reference25 articles.

1. A review of the Australian healthcare system: A policy perspective

2. Health Workforce Australia.2014. “Australia’s Future Health Workforce—Doctors.”https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/03/doctors‐australia‐s‐future‐health‐workforce‐report.pdf. Accessed August 07 2023.

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.2023Rural and Remote Health. Accessed June 04 2023.https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural‐remote‐australians/rural‐and‐remote‐health.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3