A framework on interplay of knowledge types and dimensions in pandemics – Example of COVID‐19

Author:

Parameswar Nakul1ORCID,Venkitachalam Krishna23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Entrepreneurship and Management Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Sangareddy India

2. College of Business Administration (CBA) Ajman University Ajman United Arab Emirates

3. Department of Management & Organisation Estonian Business School (EBS) Tallinn Estonia

Abstract

AbstractRecent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID‐19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID‐19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID‐19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID‐19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference75 articles.

1. An evaluation of critical knowledge areas for managing the COVID-19 pandemic

2. Abraham B.(2020).How experience of battling Nipah helped Kerala fight Coronavirus & What Rest of India can Learn. Indiatimes.https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/how‐the‐experience‐of‐battling‐nipah‐helped‐kerala‐fight‐coronavirus‐and‐what‐rest‐of‐india‐can‐learn‐from‐it‐507842.html

3. Effective knowledge mobilisation: creating environments for quick generation, dissemination, and use of evidence

4. Toward a Theoretical Model of Learning Organization and Knowledge Management Processes

5. Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3