Psychosocial services for pediatric oncology patients in low‐ and middle‐income countries from health care providers' perspectives: A survey‐based report from the SIOP Global Health Network Psychosocial Working Group

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWhile pediatric cancer survival rates have improved in high‐income countries, they remain much lower in low‐ and middle‐income countries (L/MICs). While much focus in recent years has been on remediating the survivorship gap, less is known about the psychosocial needs and availability of psychosocial services for this population.MethodsA questionnaire was created by the SIOP Global Health Network Psychosocial Working Group to assess psychosocial needs and services in L/MIC. The questionnaire was distributed to pediatric oncology professionals, both in‐person at the SIOP Annual Congress in Lyon (2019) conference and then electronically. Individuals not part of SIOP were also invited to participate via social media posts.ResultsSixty‐six respondents from 31 countries completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants were physicians, followed by nurses. Participants from low‐ and lower‐middle‐income countries (L/LMICs) perceived patients as having higher rates of anxiety and caregivers as having higher rates of depression as compared to those in upper‐middle‐income countries (UMICs). Across all L/MICs represented, 85% of physicians reported that psychosocial issues sometimes, frequently, or always affect their clinical obligations. Participants reflected on the availability of professionals who treat mental health concerns; the availability of social workers, psychologists, and non‐professional volunteers differed significantly between L/LMICs and UMICs. Treatment abandonment and myths/disinformation were highlighted as the most pressing psychosocial priorities.ConclusionOur study highlights pediatric oncology providers' perceptions of psychosocial concerns. Based on responses, proposals for minimum standards of care are made, as well as the importance of training existing providers and funding additional psychosocially‐focused professionals.