Pharmacist‐led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge

Author:

Patel Nandini1ORCID,Dannemiller Robert E.1ORCID,Kovacevic Mary P.1ORCID,Dube Kevin M.1ORCID,Lupi Kenneth E.1ORCID,Blum Rachel C.1ORCID,Crowley Kaitlin E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractPharmacist‐led interventions may reduce the inappropriate continuation of acid‐suppressive agents and antipsychotics temporarily initiated in the intensive care unit (ICU), but limited data exist for other medications. This study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist‐led intervention on the number of medications inappropriately continued upon ICU and hospital discharge. This was a single‐center, pre‐post intervention analysis conducted in the medical and surgical ICUs at a tertiary academic medical center. The pre‐ and post‐intervention groups included adults who were newly initiated on medications used for stress ulcer prophylaxis, delirium, agitation, wakefulness, sedation, and insomnia from December 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022 and December 12, 2022 to February 13, 2023, respectively. In the post‐intervention group, pharmacists identified patients who were newly initiated on a medication of interest and documented in patients' charts via an electronic handoff tool utilizing a standardized template. The appropriateness of those medications was assessed daily, and pharmacists intervened when necessary. The number of medications inappropriately continued at ICU and hospital discharge and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were compared. Overall, 399 encounters were included in the final analysis, and a total of 459 medications were newly initiated in the ICU. There was no significant difference in the number of medications inappropriately continued at hospital discharge [22 (8.4%) vs. 10 (5.1%); p = 0.17]. Significantly fewer medications were inappropriately continued at ICU discharge in the post‐intervention group [85 (32.3%) vs. 37 (18.9%); p < 0.01]. The median ICU length of stay was significantly greater in the post‐intervention group [4 (2–8) vs. 2 (1–6) days; p < 0.01]. No significant difference was found in the median hospital length of stay [14 (7–26.5) vs. 16 (9–33.75) days; p = 0.08]. Use of an electronic handoff tool was associated with a significant reduction in the number of medications inappropriately continued at ICU discharge.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3