Rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) of image‐guided FNA specimens improves subsequent core biopsy adequacy in clinical trial patients: The impact of preanalytical factors and its correlation with survival

Author:

Graham Ashleigh J.1,Robinson Mahalia T.1,Kahler Jessica2,Azadi Javad R.3ORCID,Maleki Zahra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

2. Department of Pathology University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

3. Department of Radiology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSufficient tumor collection has become of utmost importance in therapeutic experimental protocols. Rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) ensures adequate sampling for quantification of biomarkers, molecular analyses, and other ancillary studies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of ROSE in trial‐associated fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and to analyze predictors of adequacy and cumulative survival from in‐house FNA cases used in clinical trials.MethodsClinical trial FNA biopsies performed at a large academic institution were analyzed over 10 months using a comprehensive chart review of the electronic medical records. SPSS version 28 was used for statistical analysis.ResultsThree hundred twenty‐five FNAs were collected for 57 clinical trials. In total, 225 individual patients had an average of 1.4 FNA procedures each as a result of a multidepartmental collaborative effort. ROSE was performed for all patients, and adequacy was evaluated by cytotechnologists. Seventy‐eight percent of samples were considered adequate, 14% were considered less than optimal, and 8% were considered inadequate, with the latter two categories designated together as less than adequate. The imaging modalities were mainly ultrasound‐guided (n = 267; 82%) and computed tomography‐guided (n = 58; 18%). There was a statistically significant association between adequate sampling and ultrasound‐guided biopsies (83%) compared with computed tomography‐guided biopsies (59%; p < .01). The effect of body mass index (BMI) on mortality was also a significant finding. The authors observed a survival benefit in patients who had elevated BMIs (range, 25.0–34.9 kg/m2) compared with those who were underweight (BMI, <18.5 kg/m2) or class III obese (BMI, >35.0 kg/m2; p < .01). Therefore, the best predictors of adequacy and mortality were imaging modality and BMI, respectively.ConclusionsUltrasound‐guided modalities are recommended for obtaining adequate FNA sampling for clinical trials. In addition, patients with cancer who had slightly elevated BMIs (25.0–34.0 kg/m2) had increased overall survival in this cohort.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3