Influence of the Frequency‐to‐Place Function on Recognition with Place‐Based Cochlear Implant Maps

Abstract

ObjectiveComparison of acute speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) alone and electric‐acoustic stimulation (EAS) users listening with default maps or place‐based maps using either a spiral ganglion (SG) or a new Synchrotron Radiation‐Artificial Intelligence (SR‐AI) frequency‐to‐place function.MethodsThirteen adult CI‐alone or EAS users completed a task of speech recognition at initial device activation with maps that differed in the electric filter frequency assignments. The three map conditions were: (1) maps with the default filter settings (default map), (2) place‐based maps with filters aligned to cochlear SG tonotopicity using the SG function (SG place‐based map), and (3) place‐based maps with filters aligned to cochlear Organ of Corti (OC) tonotopicity using the SR‐AI function (SR‐AI place‐based map). Speech recognition was evaluated using a vowel recognition task. Performance was scored as the percent correct for formant 1 recognition due to the rationale that the maps would deviate the most in the estimated cochlear place frequency for low frequencies.ResultsOn average, participants had better performance with the OC SR‐AI place‐based map as compared to the SG place‐based map and the default map. A larger performance benefit was observed for EAS users than for CI‐alone users.ConclusionThese pilot data suggest that EAS and CI‐alone users may experience better performance with a patient‐centered mapping approach that accounts for the variability in cochlear morphology (OC SR‐AI frequency‐to‐place function) in the individualization of the electric filter frequencies (place‐based mapping procedure).Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 133:3540–3547, 2023