Excess risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection among in‐person nonhealthcare workers in six states, September 2020–June 2021

Author:

Groenewold Matthew R.1ORCID,Billock Rachael1ORCID,Free Hannah1,Burrer Sherry L.2,Sweeney Marie Haring1,Wong Jessie3,Lavender Antionette4,Argueta Gabriel4,Crawford Hannah‐Leigh4,Erukunuakpor Kimberly4,Karlsson Nicole D.5,Armenti Karla6,Thomas Hannah5,Gaetz Kim7,Dang Gialana78,Harduar‐Morano Laurel910,Modji Komi11ORCID,Luckhaupt Sara E.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cincinnati Ohio USA

2. Emergency Preparedness and Response Office, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA

3. California Department of Public Health Sacramento California USA

4. Georgia Department of Public Health Atlanta Georgia USA

5. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Concord New Hampshire USA

6. University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA

7. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Raleigh North Carolina USA

8. Western States Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Denver Colorado USA

9. Pennsylvania Department of Health Harrisburg Pennsylvania USA

10. Division of State and Local Readiness, Center for Preparedness and Response Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA

11. Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile the occupational risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection for healthcare personnel in the United States has been relatively well characterized, less information is available on the occupational risk for workers employed in other settings. Even fewer studies have attempted to compare risks across occupations and industries. Using differential proportionate distribution as an approximation, we evaluated excess risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection by occupation and industry among non‐healthcare workers in six states.MethodsWe analyzed data on occupation and industry of employment from a six‐state callback survey of adult non‐healthcare workers with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and population‐based reference data on employment patterns, adjusted for the effect of telework, from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. We estimated the differential proportionate distribution of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection by occupation and industry using the proportionate morbidity ratio (PMR).ResultsAmong a sample of 1111 workers with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, significantly higher‐than‐expected proportions of workers were employed in service occupations (PMR 1.3, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.5) and in the transportation and utilities (PMR 1.4, 99% CI 1.1–1.8) and leisure and hospitality industries (PMR 1.5, 99% CI 1.2–1.9).ConclusionsWe found evidence of significant differences in the proportionate distribution of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection by occupation and industry among respondents in a multistate, population‐based survey, highlighting the excess risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection borne by some worker populations, particularly those whose jobs require frequent or prolonged close contact with other people.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3