Characterizing hydro‐geotechnical processes of slopes implemented with bioretention cells

Abstract

AbstractLow impact development (LID) practices are rarely implemented on slopes due to concerns about their poor hydrological performance and the potential impact on slope stability. Implementing LIDs on slopes, involving alterations to surface topography and subsurface hydrology (specifically, the formation of a groundwater mound), can pose challenges in maintaining slope stability. However, sloping areas often require LIDs for sustainable development. It is imperative to supplement the conventional design standard to address these challenges. Before proposing specific solutions, the impact of LIDs on slope stability should be understood first. This includes quantifying the extent of changes in slope stability before and after LID implementation, as well as identifying the key factors that influence stability. To address these, we developed a numerical model in HYDRUS‐2D to simulate the hydrological and geotechnical processes of slopes implemented with a two‐stepped bioretention cell (BC) system. The numerical model was calibrated and validated using monitoring data from a stepped BC in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Simulation scenarios encompassed three generic slope angles (15°, 20°, and 25°) with and without BCs, two initial groundwater table positions and two inflow volumes. The hydrological process was characterized by the evolution of the groundwater mound, and the geotechnical process was quantified using the factor of safety (FoS). Our findings indicated slope cutting and filling was likely to enhance stability with an increase in the FoS of 0.1. However, the formation of groundwater mounds, resulting from exfiltration, led to an approximate 0.1–0.2 reduction in the FoS, depending on the inflow volume. The subsequent groundwater mound evolution had no further impact on stability. Ultimately, the FoS was slightly reduced by around 0–0.1 due to the combined effect of cutting and filling operations and groundwater mounds. It was generally safe to implement LIDs on 15° slopes. For steeper slopes, special design considerations are necessary, such as reducing the drainage area to strike a balance between hydrological performance and slope safety.