A comprehensive test of colour‐difference formulae and uniform colour spaces using available visual datasets

Author:

Luo Ming Ronnier1ORCID,Xu Qiang1ORCID,Pointer Michael2ORCID,Melgosa Manuel3ORCID,Cui Guihua4,Li Changjun5,Xiao Kaida2ORCID,Huang Min6

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

2. Leeds Institute of Textiles and Colour University of Leeds Leeds UK

3. Department of Optics University of Granada Granada Spain

4. College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Wenzhou University Wenzhou China

5. School of Computer and Software Engineering University of Science and Technology Liaoning Anshan China

6. Printing and packaging engineering Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractThe paper describes a comprehensive test to evaluate the performance of current colour‐difference models using available experimental datasets. In total, 28 individual datasets were accumulated to test 17 colour‐difference formulae, 13 of them based on Uniform Colour Spaces (UCSs) in terms of the Standardized Residual Sum of Squares (STRESS) measure. The 28 datasets were divided into three groups: Large Colour‐Difference data (LCD), Small Colour‐Difference data for surface colours (SCDs), and Small Colour Difference data for display colours (SCDd). For each colour model, four versions were tested: the original model, and that including kL, Gamma‐ and kL/Gamma, which are the lightness parametric factor, the colour‐difference exponent factor, and the combination of both, respectively, optimized to fit particular dataset(s). The statistical F‐test was applied to test the difference between each pair of models. Furthermore, parametric effects between the large/small colour‐difference magnitudes, and between surface/display colours were investigated. The results showed that CAM16‐UCS significantly outperformed the other models for all groups. It accurately predicted all types of data and should be proposed for colour‐difference evaluation across all industries.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference53 articles.

1. ISO/CIE 11664‐4:2019 Colorimetry ‐ part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* colour space 2019.

2. ISO/CIE 11664‐5:2009 Colorimetry ‐ part 5: CIE 1976 L*u*v* colour space and u' v' uniform chromaticity scale diagram 2009.

3. Modification to the JPC79 Colour–difference Formula

4. BFD (l:c) colour‐difference formula Part 1ndashDevelopment of the formula

5. BFD (l:c) colour‐difference formula Part 2‐Performance of the formula

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3