Understanding community provider practices in diagnosing and treating atypical anorexia nervosa: A mixed methods study

Author:

Johnson‐Munguia Sarah1ORCID,Bottera Angeline R.1ORCID,Vanzhula Irina1ORCID,Forbush Kelsie T.1ORCID,Gould Sara R.2ORCID,Negi Sonakshi1ORCID,Thomeczek Marianna L.1ORCID,L'Insalata Alexa M.1ORCID,Like Emily E.1ORCID,Sharma Anjali R.1ORCID,Morgan R. William1ORCID,Rasheed Samiya1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA

2. Department of Pediatrics Children's Mercy Kansas City Missouri USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThere is a lack of consensus in defining “significant weight loss” when diagnosing atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN) and no guidelines exist for setting target weight (TW). The current study aimed to identify community providers’ practices related to the diagnosis of atypical AN and the determination of TW. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether professional discipline impacted “significant weight loss” definitions.MethodA variety of providers (N = 141; 96.4% female) completed an online survey pertaining to diagnostic and treatment practices with atypical AN. Descriptive statistics were computed to characterize provider‐based practices and Fisher's exact tests were used to test for differences in diagnostic practices by professional discipline. Thematic analysis was used to examine open‐ended questions.ResultsMost (63.97%) providers diagnosed atypical AN in the absence of any weight loss if other AN criteria were met, but doctoral‐level psychologists and medical professionals were less likely to do so compared to nutritional or other mental health professionals. Most providers found weight gain was only sometimes necessary for atypical AN recovery. Qualitative responses revealed providers found atypical AN to be a stigmatizing label that was not taken seriously. Providers preferred to use an individualized approach focused on behaviors, rather than weight when diagnosing and treating atypical AN.DiscussionLack of diagnostic clarity and concrete treatment guidelines for atypical AN may result in substantial deviations from the DSM‐5‐TR criteria in real‐world practice. Clinically useful diagnostic definitions for restrictive eating disorders and evidence‐based treatment guidelines for TW and/or other relevant recovery metrics are needed.Public SignificanceThe current study found variability in how community providers diagnose and determine target recovery weight for atypical anorexia nervosa (atypical AN). Many providers viewed the diagnosis of atypical AN as stigmatizing and preferred to focus on behaviors, rather than weight. This study underscores the importance of creating a clinically useful diagnostic definition and guidelines for recovery for atypical AN backed by empirical evidence that providers may implement in practice.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3