Bring digital twins back to Earth

Author:

Saltelli Andrea12ORCID,Gigerenzer Gerd3,Hulme Mike4,Katsikopoulos Konstantinos V.5,Melsen Lieke A.6,Peters Glen P.7,Pielke Roger8,Robertson Simon9ORCID,Stirling Andy10,Tavoni Massimo11,Puy Arnald12

Affiliation:

1. UPF Barcelona School of Management Barcelona Spain

2. Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities University of Bergen Bergen Norway

3. Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin Germany

4. Department of Geography at the University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

5. Centre for Operational Research University of Southampton Southampton UK

6. Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands

7. CICERO Center for International Climate Research Oslo Norway

8. University of Colorado Boulder Boulder Colorado USA

9. University of New South Wales Sydney Kensington Australia

10. Science Policy Research Unit Sussex University Brighton UK

11. School of Management Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy

12. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

Abstract

AbstractWe reflect on the development of digital twins of the Earth, which we associate with a reductionist view of nature as a machine. The projects of digital twins deviate from contemporary scientific paradigms in the treatment of complexity and uncertainty, and does not engage with critical and interpretative social sciences. We contest the utility of digital twins for addressing climate change issues and discuss societal risks associated with the concept, including the twins' potential to reinforce economicism and governance by numbers, emphasizing concerns about democratic accountability. We propose a more balanced alternative, advocating for independent institutions to develop diverse models, prioritize communication with simple heuristic‐based models, collect comprehensive data from various sources, including traditional knowledge, and shift focus away from physics‐centered variables to inform climate action. We argue that the advancement of digital twins should hinge on stringent controls, favoring a nuanced, interdisciplinary, and democratic approach that prioritizes societal well‐being over blind pursuit of computational sophistication.This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Earth System Models Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models Climate, History, Society, Culture > Disciplinary Perspectives

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3