Using a severity threshold to improve occupational injury surveillance: Assessment of a severe traumatic injury‐based occupational health indicator across the International Classification of Diseases lexicon transition

Author:

Sears Jeanne M.1234ORCID,Victoroff Tristan M.5,Bowman Stephen M.6,Marsh Suzanne M.7,Borjan Marija8ORCID,Reilly Anna9ORCID,Fletcher Alicia10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Systems and Population Health University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center Seattle Washington USA

4. Institute for Work and Health Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Western States Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Spokane Washington USA

6. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA

7. Division of Safety Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Morgantown West Virginia USA

8. New Jersey Department of Health Occupational Health Surveillance Unit Trenton New Jersey USA

9. Louisiana Department of Health Office of Public Health New Orleans Louisiana USA

10. New York State Department of Health Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention Albany New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTraumatic injury is a leading cause of death and disability among US workers. Severe injuries are less subject to systematic ascertainment bias related to factors such as reporting barriers, inpatient admission criteria, and workers' compensation coverage. A state‐based occupational health indicator (OHI #22) was initiated in 2012 to track work‐related severe traumatic injury hospitalizations. After 2015, OHI #22 was reformulated to account for the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) to ICD‐10‐CM. This study describes rates and trends in OHI #22, alongside corresponding metrics for all work‐related hospitalizations.MethodsSeventeen states used hospital discharge data to calculate estimates for calendar years 2012–2019. State‐panel fixed‐effects regression was used to model linear trends in annual work‐related hospitalization rates, OHI #22 rates, and the proportion of work‐related hospitalizations resulting from severe injuries. Models included calendar year and pre‐ to post‐ICD‐10‐CM transition.ResultsWork‐related hospitalization rates showed a decreasing monotonic trend, with no significant change associated with the ICD‐10‐CM transition. In contrast, OHI #22 rates showed a monotonic increasing trend from 2012 to 2014, then a significant 50% drop, returning to a near‐monotonic increasing trend from 2016 to 2019. On average, OHI #22 accounted for 12.9% of work‐related hospitalizations before the ICD‐10‐CM transition, versus 9.1% post‐transition.ConclusionsAlthough hospital discharge data suggest decreasing work‐related hospitalizations over time, work‐related severe traumatic injury hospitalizations are apparently increasing. OHI #22 contributes meaningfully to state occupational health surveillance efforts by reducing the impact of factors that differentially obscure minor injuries; however, OHI #22 trend estimates must account for the ICD‐10‐CM transition‐associated structural break in 2015.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference67 articles.

1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Workplace safety and health topics: traumatic occupational injuries. 2022. Accessed January 17 2023.http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/injury/

2. Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States

3. Estimating the costs of occupational injury in the United States

4. Economic Burden of Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States

5. Wounding the Messenger: The New Economy Makes Occupational Health Indicators Too Good to Be True

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3