Dissociative identity disorder: a review of the diagnosis that divides-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dissociative identity disorder: a review of the diagnosis that divides

Published:2024-04 Issue:2 Volume:28 Page:23-27
ISSN:1367-7543
Container-title:Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry
language:en
Short-container-title:Prog Neurol Psychiatry

Author:

Young Matilda¹,Almaskati Mazen²,Vrabtchev Svetlin³,Kuruvilla Tarun⁴

Affiliation:

1. Dr Young is a Core Trainee in Psychiatry (CT3), at Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

2. Dr Almaskati is a Higher Trainee in Psychiatry (ST4), at Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

3. Dr Vrabtchev is a Consultant Medical Psychotherapist at Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust

4. Professor Kuruvilla is a Consultant Psychiatrist at GHC and Visiting Professor at University of Gloucestershire, UK.

Abstract

The diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder (DID) has been associated with controversy and remains an area of dispute among clinicians to this day. This review explores the evolution of the diagnosis and how it is currently described and understood in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐11) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5). Also considered, are recent implications for clinical practice, treatment recommendations and the potential for any medicolegal issues to emerge.

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pnp.834

Reference41 articles.

1. Dissociative identity disorder: out of the shadows at last?

2. Dispelling Myths About Dissociative Identity Disorder Treatment: An Empirically Based Approach

3. Is it Trauma- or Fantasy-based? Comparing dissociative identity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, simulators, and controls

4. Dissociative identity disorder: Medicolegal challenges;Farrell HM;J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,2011

5. A Cross-Cultural Test of the Trauma Model of Dissociation