Mixed-methods assessment of surgical capacity in two regions in Ethiopia

Author:

Iverson K R12,Garringer K1ORCID,Ahearn O1,Alidina S1,Citron I1,Esseye S34,Teshome A3,Mukhopadhyay S15,Burssa D3,Mengistu A4,Ashengo T4,Meara J G6,Barash D7,Drown L8,Kuchuckhidze S8,Reynolds C9,Joshua B9,Barringer E10,Skeels A11,Shrime M G8,Gultie T4,Sharma S8,Geiger J8,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA

3. Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

4. Jhpiego, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

5. Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut, East Hartford, Connecticut, USA

6. Harvard Medical School and Children's Hospital of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

7. GE Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

8. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

9. Assist International, Ripon, California, USA

10. Dalberg, New York, USA

11. Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgery is among the most neglected parts of healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. Ethiopia has launched a national strategic plan to address challenges in the surgical system. This study aimed to assess surgical capacity in two Ethiopian regions to inform priority areas for improvement. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted using two tools adapted from the Lancet Commission's Surgical Assessment Tools: a quantitative Hospital Assessment Tool and a qualitative semistructured interview tool. Fifteen hospitals selected by the Federal Ministry of Health were surveyed in the Tigray and Amhara regions to assess the surgical system across five domains: service delivery, infrastructure, workforce, information management and financing. Results Service delivery was low across hospitals with a mean(s.d.) of 5(6) surgical cases per week and a narrow range of procedures performed. Hospitals reported varying availability of basic infrastructure, including constant availability of electricity (9 of 15) and running water (5 of 15). Unavailable or broken diagnostic equipment was also common. The majority of surgical and anaesthesia services were provided by non-physician clinicians, with little continuing education available. All hospitals tracked patient-level data regularly and eight of 15 hospitals reported surgical volume data during the assessment, but research activities were limited. Hospital financing specified for surgery was rare and the majority of patients must pay out of pocket for care. Conclusion Results from this study will inform programmes to simultaneously improve each of the health system domains in Ethiopia; this is required if better access to and quality of surgery, anaesthesia and obstetric services are to be achieved.

Funder

GE Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3