Dosimetric consequences of flap dose due to rapid beam off control for a high intensity carbon ion radiation therapy synchrotron

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) the predominant method of irradiation is raster scanning, called dose driven continuous scanning (DDCS) by Hitachi, allowing for continuous synchrotron extraction. The reduction in irradiation time is highly beneficial in minimizing the impact of patient and target movement on dose distribution. The RF knock out (RFKO) slow‐extraction method is commonly used for beam on/off control. When the Hitachi synchrotron receives a beam off signal the control system stops the RFKO and after some delay time (t‐delay) during which the beam intensity declines, a high‐speed steering magnet (HSST) is used to sweep the remaining beam from isocenter to a beam dump for safety reasons. Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) will use a very short delay of the HSST operation from the RFKO beam OFF signal to minimize the delay time and delayed dose. MCF clinical beam intensity, a tenfold increase over HIMAK, is still less than 100 mMU/ms (approximately 4.9 × 109 pps for 430 MeV/u).PurposeThe rapid beam off control (RBOC) proposed for MCF is associated with the occurrence of flap dose (FD), which refers to the asymmetric shoulder of the spot dose profile formed from the beam bent by HSST deviating from its planned spot position on the isocenter plane. In this study, we quantitatively assessed FD, proposed a treatment planning system (TPS) implementation using a flap spot (FS) and evaluated its impact on dose distribution.MethodThe experiments were conducted at the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIMAK) varying the t‐delay from 0.01 to 1 ms in a research environment to simulate the MCF RBOC. We studied the dependence of FD position on beam transport and its dependence on energy and beam intensity. FD was generated by delivering 10000 continuous spots on the central axis that are occasionally triggered by an external 10 Hz gate signal. Measurements were conducted using an oscilloscope, and the nozzle's spot position monitor (SPM) and dose monitor (DM).ResultAll spot profile data were corrected for the gain of the SPM's beam intensity dependence. FD was determined by fitting the (SPM) Profile data to a double Gaussian. The position of the FS was found to be transport path dependent, with FS occurring on the opposite sides of the scanning x‐direction for vertical and horizontal ports, respectively, as predicted by transport calculations. It was observed that the FD increases with beam intensity and did not exhibit a significant dependence on energy. The effect of FD on treatment planning is shown to have no significant dose impact on the organs at risk (OARs) near the target for clinical beam intensities and a modest increase for very high intensities.ConclusionUsing HIMAK in research mode the implications are that the FD has no clinical impact on the clinical CIRT beam intensities for MCF and maybe planned for higher intensities by incorporating FS into the TPS to predict the modest increased dose to OARs. A method for commissioning and quality assurance of FD has been proposed.