A proposed modification to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification for knee osteoarthritis using a compartment‐specific approach

Author:

Perico Diego Alarcón1,Uribe Abelardo Camacho1,Niño Sara Jaimes2,Mayorga María Camila Peñaloza1,Sundfeld Christian1,Lievano Jorge Rojas13,Mendoza Cristal Castellanos13,Ramirez Rafael Gómez2,Rapalino Oscar Rivero2,Zayed Gamal13,Arango German Carrillo13,Mieth Klaus13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá Bogotá Colombia

2. Department of Radiology Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá Bogotá Colombia

3. School of Medicine Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá Colombia

Abstract

AbstractPurposeSince Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) originally classified knee osteoarthritis, several authors have reported varying levels of reliability and a lack of uniformity in the use of this classification system. We propose several modifications to the KL classification including the use of a compartment‐specific approach that we hypothesize will lead to a better understanding of knee OA while maintaining an adequate interobserver and intraobserver reliability.MethodsWe propose the addition of the lateral and skyline‐view radiographs to the standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections in the evaluation. Also suggest a more precise definition of the evaluated parameters; the addition of the subchondral cancellous bone as parameter of evaluation; and the assessment of medial tibiofemoral compartment (MTFC), lateral tibiofemoral compartment (LTFC) and patellofemoral compartment (PFC) separately resulting in a compartment‐specific KL staging score rather than a single overall KL score. Six evaluators (two knee surgeons, two radiologists and two knee fellows) used the modified KL classification to classify 230 randomly selected knees on two separate occasions. Reliabilities were assessed by calculating Krippendorff's coefficients.ResultsTwo hundred and ten knees were included for final evaluation and analyses (53% left knees; 65% females; mean age 56 years old). Average interobserver reliability was moderate for all compartments (0.51 for the MTFC; 0.51 for the LTFC; and 0.56 for the PFC). Average intraobserver reliability was substantial for all compartments (0.63 for the MTFC; 0.65 for the LTFC; and 0.7 for the PFC). Experienced evaluators showed a higher intraobserver reliability than less‐experienced evaluators.ConclusionsA modified compartment‐specific KL classification enables a practical and detailed description of knee OA involvement and demonstrates acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reliability.Level of Evidence: Level III

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3