Effect of whitening concepts on surface roughness and optical characteristics of resin‐based composites: An AFM study

Author:

Erturk‐Avunduk Ayse Tugba1ORCID,Delikan Ebru2ORCID,Cengiz‐Yanardag Esra1ORCID,Karakaya Izgen3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Mersin University Mersin Turkey

2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Nuh Naci Yazgan University Kayseri Turkey

3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry European University of Lefke Mersin10 Turkey

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various whitening agents on the surface roughness and optical characteristics of different types of resin composite restorations. Fifty specimens were prepared for each resin [G‐ænial Posterior (GP), SonicFill‐2 (SF), Solidex (SDX), and Nova Compo HF (NC)]. Following baseline color and surface roughness (Ra) measurements, the specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 10/group) according to whitening concepts: control (distilled water), in‐office bleaching [OB‐(Opalescence Boost)], at‐home bleaching [HB‐(Opalescence PF)], whitening toothpaste [WT‐(Signal White Now)], and whitening mouthwash [WM‐(Listerine Advanced White)]. ∆E00, ∆TP00, and ∆WID values were calculated before and after the whitening procedure with a spectrophotometer using the CIEDE2000 formula. Surface roughness measurements were repeated. The surface topography was determined using atomic force microscopy. Two‐ and three‐way analyses of variance and Tukey's post‐hoc test were performed, with p < 0.05 regarded as indicative of significance. No significant differences were detected among the resin composite materials in terms of the ΔE00 values (p > 0.05). Color change of all resin materials was above the AT threshold (>1.8) and the PT threshold (>0.8). All restorative materials presented acceptable (AT<2.62) TP00 values. Solidex specimens demonstrated the lowest WID values compared to the other composites. There were significant differences among the whitening procedures with respect to ΔE00, ΔTP00, and WID values (p < 0.001). SF/WT combination showed the highest and clinically unacceptable ΔE00 values. The highest roughness values were observed in the SDX specimens and the combination of SDX/OB. The effect of whitening agents on the optical characteristics and surface roughness of restorative materials depends on the type of material, agent, and time.Research Highlights Clinicians should be aware that long‐term use of over‐the‐counter products due to the abrasive effects of their ingredients and repeated bleaching session applications may affect the color stability and surface roughness of resin composites.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Instrumentation,Histology,Anatomy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3