Delivering decision making support to people with cognitive disability—What more has been learned from pilot programmes in Australia and internationally from 2016 to 2021?

Author:

Then Shih‐Ning1ORCID,Duffy Julia1,Bigby Christine2ORCID,Sinclair Craig3,Wiesel Ilan4,Carney Terry5ORCID,Douglas Jacinta2

Affiliation:

1. Australian Centre for Health Law Research, School of Law Queensland University of Technology Brisbane City Queensland Australia

2. Living with Disability Research Centre La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. School of Psychology University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Science Faculty University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

5. University of Sydney Law School Camperdown New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractArticle 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has been instrumental in driving the development of the concept and practice of supported decision making. An important feature has been the development of “supported decision making pilots.” This paper identifies, describes and analyses pilot programmes providing support for decision making for people with cognitive disabilities in Australia and internationally between 2016 and 2021. It finds that challenges included providing support for socially isolated people and adequately resourcing those programmes. However, most pilots reported positive outcomes for decision makers, adding to the evidence base for claims to be made about the positive impact of supported decision making on the lives of people with disabilities. The pilots demonstrate that, internationally, there is an emerging set of programmes that seek to promote supported decision making incrementally through developing focussed community awareness and practice. While still small‐scale, time‐limited and experimental, with different levels of rigour in practice and evaluation, they provide some foundation and a preliminary evidence base for larger interventions and reforms in the future.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference35 articles.

1. Restoring Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities

2. Bach M.&Kerzner L.(2010)A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity: advancing substantive equality for persons with disabilities through law. Policy and Practice Law Commission of Ontario.

3. Balandin S. Frawkey P.&Watson J.(2016)Oval project evaluation: interim report december 2016 Unpublished.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Supported decision-making and the Disability Royal Commission;Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities;2024-01-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3