Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?

Published:2022-09-14 Issue:12 Volume:31 Page:2630-2647
ISSN:1057-9230
Container-title:Health Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Economics

Author:

Huls Samare P. I.¹²^ORCID,Lancsar Emily³,Donkers Bas²⁴^ORCID,Ride Jemimah⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands

2. Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands

3. Department of Health Services Research and Policy Research School of Population Health Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

4. Erasmus School of Economics Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands

5. Health Economics Unit Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

Funder

Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hec.4599

Reference54 articles.

1. Are Results from Non‐hypothetical Choice‐based Conjoint Analyses and Non‐hypothetical Recoded‐ranking Conjoint Analyses Similar?

2. Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Developing a person-centered stated preference survey for dementia with Lewy bodies: value of a personal and public involvement process;Frontiers in Dementia;2024-07-15

2. Putting the Choice in Choice Tasks: Incorporating Preference Elicitation Tasks in Health Preference Research;The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research;2024-05-14

3. A happiness approach to valuing health states for children;Social Science & Medicine;2024-05

4. Data management and techniques for best–worst discrete choice experiments;The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata;2023-12

5. A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors;Medical Decision Making;2022-12-24