Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines

Author:

Monaghan Sara A.1ORCID,Eck Steven2,Bunting Silvia3,Dong Xiangyang X.4,Durso Robert J.5,Gonneau Christele6,Hays Amanda7,Illingworth Andrea8,League Stacy C.9,Linskens Eleni10,McCausland Megan11,McCloskey Thomas W.12,Rolf Nina13ORCID,Shi Min14,Wallace Paul K.15ORCID,Litwin Virginia16,Kern Wolfgang17,Deeb George18,Nash Veronica19,Olteanu Horatiu14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Astra Zeneca Gaithersburg Maryland USA

3. Department of Pathology Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston Florida USA

4. Department of Clinical Flow Cytometry Quest Diagnostics Lewisville Texas USA

5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Tarrytown New York USA

6. Labcorp Geneva Switzerland

7. BioAgilytix Durham North Carolina USA

8. Dahl‐Chase Diagnostic Services Bangor Maine USA

9. Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

10. Department of Clinical Biology, Laboratory Hematology University Hospital Brussels Brussels Belgium

11. Q2 Solutions Marietta Georgia USA

12. ICON Laboratory Services New York USA

13. BC Children's Hospital Research Institute University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

14. Division of Hematopathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

15. SciGro, Inc. Sedona Arizona USA

16. Eurofins Clinical Trial Solutions Québec Canada

17. MLL Münchner Leukämielabor Munich Germany

18. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA

19. Cerba Research New York USA

Abstract

AbstractThe Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62—Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit‐for‐purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory‐initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3