Affiliation:
1. School of Energy and Power Engineering University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai People's Republic of China
2. Huzhou institute of Zhejiang University Huzhou Zhejiang People's Republic of China
3. Shanghai Non‐carbon Energy Conversion and Utilization Institute Jiaotong University Shanghai People's Republic of China
4. Shanghai Marine Diesel engine Research Institute Shanghai People's Republic of China
Abstract
AbstractTo discover the “coordinative effect” within MEA‐polyamines, the non‐catalytic CO2 absorption‐desorption tests were conducted within tri‐solvents of “MEA‐TETA (triethylenetetramine)‐DEEA (N, N‐diethylethanolamine)/AMP(2‐amino‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanol)” at specific concentrations of .1 ~ .5 + 2 + 2 mol/L for the first time. The energy efficient combinations were detected of MEA‐TETA based tri‐solvents with solid acid catalysts, from catalytic CO2 desorption experiments onto MEA‐TETA‐DEEA/MEA‐TETA‐AMP with several commercial solid acid catalysts: blended γ‐Al2O3/H‐ZSM‐5 = 2:1, H‐mordenite, H‐Beta (Hβ), HND‐580, and HND‐8. Three parameters were adopted to evaluate desorption activity: average desorption rate, heat duty, and desorption factors (DFs). After analyses, the .1 + 2 + 2 mol/L MEA‐TETA‐AMP with catalyst HND‐8 possessed the best CO2 desorption at 95–98°C with biggest DF. The desorption ability of DEEA was better than AMP, but with aid of solid acid catalyst, the AMP can release more CO2 than DEEA due to weak stability of AMP‐CO2− carbamate.
Funder
Huzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau