Predictors of SOZ localization, subsequent surgical intervention, and seizure outcomes in iEEG

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveA third of the patients who undergo intracranial EEG (iEEG) for seizure‐onset zone (SOZ) localization do not proceed to resective surgery for epilepsy, and over half of those who do continue to have seizures following treatment. To better identify candidates who are more likely to see benefits from undergoing iEEG, we investigated preoperative and iEEG peri‐operative features associated with the localization of a putative SOZ, undergoing subsequent surgical treatment, and seizure outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent iEEG from 2001 to 2022 at two institutions. Outcomes included SOZ identification, proceeding to surgical treatment (resection vs. neuromodulation), and subsequent seizure freedom.ResultsWe identified 329 unique patients who were followed for a median of 3.9 (IQR:7) years, with a minimum of 2‐year follow‐up for seizure outcomes analyses. Multivariate analysis identified lateralized and lobar localization on scalp EEG (OR 3.8, p = 0.001) to be associated with SOZ localization. Patients with unilateral localization on scalp EEG (OR 3.0, p = 0.003), unilateral preimplantation hypothesis (OR 3.1, p = 0.001), and lesional preoperative MRI (OR 2.1, p = 0.033) were more likely to undergo resection than neuromodulation. Similarly, a unilateral pre‐implantation hypothesis (OR 2.6, p < 0.001) favored seizure freedom, whereas prior neuromodulation (OR 0.3, p = 0.013) decreased the odds. Larger number of preoperative anti‐seizure medications (ASMs) did not influence seizure freedom rates but did decrease favorable (Engel I, II) seizure outcomes (OR 0.7, p = 0.026).InterpretationNon‐invasive localization data prior to iEEG are associated with subsequent resection and seizure freedom, independent of iEEG localization. Factors predictive of SOZ localization are not necessarily predictive of post‐operative seizure freedom.