Optimized microburst VNS elicits fMRI responses beyond thalamic‐specific response from standard VNS

Author:

Szaflarski Jerzy P.1ORCID,Allendorfer Jane B.1,Begnaud Jason2,Ranuzzi Giovanni2,Shamshiri Elhum2,Verner Ryan2,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology and the UAB Epilepsy Center Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

2. LivaNova Inc Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIn parallel to standard vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), microburst stimulation delivery has been developed. We evaluated the fMRI‐related signal changes associated with standard and optimized microburst stimulation in a proof‐of‐concept study (NCT03446664).MethodsTwenty‐nine drug‐resistant epilepsy patients were prospectively implanted with VNS. Three 3T fMRI scans were collected 2 weeks postimplantation. The maximum tolerated VNS intensity was determined prior to each scan starting at 0.125 mA with 0.125 mA increments. FMRI scans were block‐design with alternating 30 sec stimulation [ON] and 30 sec no stimulation [OFF]: Scan 1 utilized standard VNS and Scan 3 optimized microburst parameters to determine target settings. Semi‐automated on‐site fMRI data processing utilized ON–OFF block modeling to determine VNS‐related fMRI activation per stimulation setting. Anatomical thalamic mask was used to derive highest mean thalamic t‐value for determination of microburst stimulation parameters. Paired t‐tests corrected at P < 0.05 examined differences in fMRI responses to each stimulation type.ResultsStandard and microburst stimulation intensities at Scans 1 and 3 were similar (P = 0.16). Thalamic fMRI responses were obtained in 28 participants (19 with focal; 9 with generalized seizures). Group activation maps showed standard VNS elicited thalamic activation while optimized microburst VNS showed widespread activation patterns including thalamus. Comparison of stimulation types revealed significantly greater cerebellar, midbrain, and parietal fMRI signal changes in microburst compared to standard VNS. These differences were not associated with seizure responses.InterpretationWhile standard and optimized microburst VNS elicited thalamic activation, microburst also engaged other brain regions. Relationship between these fMRI activation patterns and clinical response warrants further investigation.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03446664).

Funder

LivaNova

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3