A classification approach to improve out of sample predictability of structure‐based constitutive models for ascending thoracic aortic tissue

Author:

Tong Tuan‐Thinh1,Nightingale Miriam23,Scott Michael B.4,Sigaeva Taisiya5,Fedak Paul W. M.36,Barker Alex J.7,Di Martino Elena S.23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Calgary Calgary Canada

2. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Calgary Calgary Canada

3. Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Canada

4. Department of Radiology Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA

5. Department of Systems Design Engineering University of Waterloo Waterloo Canada

6. Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Canada

7. Department of Radiology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractIn this research, a pipeline was developed to assess the out‐of‐sample predictive capability of structure‐based constitutive models of ascending aortic aneurysmal tissue. The hypothesis being tested is that a biomarker can help establish similarities among tissues sharing the same level of a quantifiable property, thus enabling the development of biomarker‐specific constitutive models. Biomarker‐specific averaged material models were constructed from biaxial mechanical tests of specimens that shared similar biomarker properties such as level of blood‐wall shear stress or microfiber (elastin or collagen) degradation in the extracellular matrix. Using a cross‐validation strategy commonly used in classification algorithms, biomarker‐specific averaged material models were assessed in contrast to individual tissue mechanics of out of sample specimens that fell under the same category but did not contribute to the averaged model's generation. The normalized root means square errors (NRMSE) calculated on out‐of‐sample data were compared with average models when no categorization was performed versus biomarker‐specific models and among different level of a biomarker. Different biomarker levels exhibited statistically different NRMSE when compared among each other, indicating more common features shared by the specimens belonging to the lower error groups. However, no specific biomarkers reached a significant difference when compared to the average model created when No Categorization was performed, possibly on account of unbalanced number of specimens. The method developed could allow for the screening of different biomarkers or combinations/interactions in a systematic manner leading the way to larger datasets and to more individualized constitutive approaches.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Molecular Biology,Modeling and Simulation,Biomedical Engineering,Software

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3