Affiliation:
1. Department of Statistics The Ohio State University 1958 Neil Avenue Columbus Ohio 43210 USA
2. School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
Abstract
Cluster randomized designs (CRD) provide a rigorous development for randomization principles for studies where treatments are allocated to cluster units rather than the individual subjects within clusters. It is known that CRDs are less efficient than completely randomized designs since the randomization of treatment allocation is applied to the cluster units. To mitigate this problem, we embed a ranked set sampling design from survey sampling studies into CRD for the selection of both cluster and subsampling units. We show that ranking groups in ranked set sampling act like a covariate, reduce the expected mean squared cluster error, and increase the precision of the sampling design. We provide an optimality result to determine the sample sizes at cluster and sub‐sample level. We apply the proposed sampling design to a dental study on human tooth size, and to a longitudinal study from an education intervention program.
Funder
Grains Research and Development Corporation
Subject
Statistics and Probability,Epidemiology
Reference31 articles.
1. HeagertyPJ DeLongER.NIH collaboratory living textbook of pragmatic clinical trials.2020https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/design/experimental‐designs‐randomization‐schemes‐top/cluster‐randomized‐trials/
2. A brief history of the cluster randomized trail design;Moberg J;JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation,2015
3. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers
4. Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trial