Unauthorized ingredients in “nootropic” dietary supplements: A review of the history, pharmacology, prevalence, international regulations, and potential as doping agents

Author:

Jędrejko Karol1ORCID,Catlin Oliver2,Stewart Timothy2,Anderson Ashley3,Muszyńska Bożena1,Catlin Don H.24

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków Poland

2. Banned Substances Control Group (BSCG) Los Angeles California USA

3. International Sports Pharmacists Network Fort Collins Colorado USA

4. Department of Medicine and Molecular and Medical Pharmacology University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Los Angeles California USA

Abstract

AbstractThe first nootropic prohibited in sport was fonturacetam (4‐phenylpiracetam, carphedon) in 1998. Presented here 25 years later is a broad‐scale consideration of the history, pharmacology, prevalence, regulations, and doping potential of nootropics viewed through a lens of 50 selected dietary supplements (DS) marketed as “cognitive enhancement,” “brain health,” “brain boosters,” or “nootropics,” with a focus on unauthorized ingredients. Nootropic DS have risen to prominence over the last decade often as multicomponent formulations of bioactive ingredients presenting compelling pharmacological questions and potential public health concerns. Many popular nootropics are unauthorized food or DS ingredients according to the European Commission including huperzine A, yohimbine, and dimethylaminoethanol; unapproved pharmaceuticals like phenibut or emoxypine (mexidol); previously registered drugs like meclofenoxate or reserpine; EU authorized pharmaceuticals like piracetam or vinpocetine; infamous doping agents like methylhexaneamine or dimethylbutylamine; and other investigational substances and peptides. Several are authorized DS ingredients in the United States resulting in significant global variability as to what qualifies as a legal nootropic. Prohibited stimulants or ß2‐agonists commonly used in “pre‐workout,” “weight loss,” or “thermogenic” DS such as octodrine, hordenine, or higenamine are often stacked with nootropic substances. While stimulants and ß2‐agonists are defined as doping agents by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA), many nootropics are not, although some may qualify as non‐approved substances or related substances under catch‐all language in the WADA Prohibited List. Synergistic combinations, excessive dosing, or recently researched pharmacology may justify listing certain nootropics as doping agents or warrant additional attention in future regulations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Spectroscopy,Pharmaceutical Science,Environmental Chemistry,Analytical Chemistry

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3