Affiliation:
1. USDA‐ARS, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit Fayetteville Arkansas USA
2. Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington Texas USA
3. Environmental Dynamics Program University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA
4. USDA‐ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center Booneville Arkansas USA
5. Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory Temple Texas USA
6. USDA ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and The Environment Ames Iowa USA
7. Animal Science Department University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA
Abstract
AbstractRemote sensing tools, along with Global Navigation Satellite System cattle collars and digital soil maps, may help elucidate spatiotemporal relationships among soils, terrain, forages, and animals. However, standard computational procedures preclude systems‐level evaluations across this continuum due to data inoperability and processing limitations. Deep learning, a subset of neural network, may elucidate efficiency of livestock production and linkages within the livestock‐grazing environment. Consequently, we applied deep learning to environmental remote sensing data to (1) develop predictive models for yield and forage nutrition based on vegetation indices and (2) at a pixel‐level (per 55 m2), identify how grazing is linked to soil properties, forage growth and nutrition, and terrain attributes in silvopasture and pasture‐only systems. Remotely sensed data rapidly and non‐destructively estimated herbage mass and nutritive value for enhanced net and primary productivity management in livestock and grazing systems. Cattle grazed big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii ‘Vitman’) with 182% greater frequency than orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) in the pasture‐only system. Real‐time estimates of vegetative bands may assist in predicting grazing pressure for more efficient pasture resource management. Cattle grazing followed distinct soil‐landscape patterns, namely reduced cattle grazing preference occurred in areas of water accumulation, which highlights linkages among terrain, soil‐water movement, soil properties, forage nutrition, and animal grazing response spatially and temporally. Results from this study could be scaled up to improve grazing management among the largest land‐use category in the United States, that is, grasslands, which would allow for sustainable intensification of forage‐based livestock production to meet growing demands for environmentally responsible protein.
Reference66 articles.
1. Abadi M. Agarwal A. Barham P. Brevdo E. Chen Z. Citro C. Corrado G. S. Davis A. Dean J. Devin M. Ghemawat S. Goodfellow I. Harp A. Irving G. Isard M. Jozefowicz R. Jia Y. Kaiser L. Kudlur M. …Zheng X.(2015).TensorFlow: Large‐scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems(Version v2) [Computer software]. arXiv.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04467
2. Soil CO
2
evolution is driven by forage species, soil moisture, grazing pressure, poultry litter fertilization, and seasonality in silvopastures
3. Relating topography and soil phosphorus distribution in litter‐amended pastures in Arkansas
4. Topographic Controls on Soil Nutrient Variations in a Silvopasture System
5. Significance of epochs on training a neural network;Afaq S.;International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research,2020