Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample

Published:2014-08-16 Issue:7 Volume:44 Page:736-742
ISSN:0046-2772
Container-title:European Journal of Social Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.

Author:

Browne Matthew¹²^ORCID,Pennycook Gordon³,Goodwin Belinda¹²,McHenry Melinda⁴²

Affiliation:

1. School of Human, Health and Social Sciences

2. Central Queensland University; Rockhampton Australia

3. Department of Psychology; University of Waterloo; Waterloo Canada

4. School of Medical and Applied Sciences

Funder

Central Queensland University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference44 articles.

1. Secularization, higher education, and religiosity;Albrecht;Review of Religious Research,1984

2. Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis;Argue;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1999

3. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2013 Reflecting a nation: Stories from the 2011 census, 2012-2013, (cat no. 2071.0) http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2071.0

4. Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought;Barr;Thinking & Reasoning,2014

Cited by 56 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do Religiosity and Spirituality Differ in Their Relationship with Crystallized Intelligence? Evidence from the General Social Survey;Journal of Intelligence;2024-07-07

2. Sex Differences in Cognitive Reflection: A Meta-Analysis;Journal of Intelligence;2024-03-29

3. On the Disposition to Think Analytically: Four Distinct Intuitive-Analytic Thinking Styles;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin;2023-03-02

4. Demographic Differences in Compliance with COVID-19 Vaccination Timing and Completion Guidelines in the United States;Vaccines;2023-02-06

5. Échelle de croyances non admises scientifiquement : validation française du Survey of Scientifically Unaccepted Beliefs;L’Année psychologique;2022-10-20