Cost‐benefit analyses of developmental crime prevention programmes

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChildren and youth who are at risk of becoming early‐onset life‐course‐persistent offenders often slip through the cracks of other systems in society (e.g., health, education, child welfare, substance use and mental health). When they do, they impose an enormous economic burden on society. Developmental crime prevention (DCP) programmes seek to reduce these costs through evidence‐based interventions that target individual child and family risk and protective factors for antisocial behaviour.AimThis study reviewed cost‐benefit analysis studies of DCP interventions to identify whether they produced monetary benefits that exceeded programme costs.MethodWe searched the literature for studies of interventions that were evaluated using high‐quality research methods (i.e., experimental or quasi‐experimental designs). Key characteristics of these evaluations are summarised and benefit‐to‐cost ratios (BCRs) are reported.ResultsEleven cost‐benefit analysis (CBA) evaluations met study criteria. The programmes varied in terms of who they targeted (e.g., pregnant mothers, at‐risk youth), the age of participants (e.g., adults, children, older youth), the intervention duration (e.g., 10 weeks to 4 years), and the follow‐up interval (e.g., 6 months to 50 years). Ten of the 11 studies produced favourable BCRs, ranging between 1.35 and 31.77, depending on the type and scope of outcomes that were monetised.ConclusionThere is strong evidence in support of DCP from a cost‐benefit perspective. However, given the small number of studies for analysis, more prospective longitudinal CBA evaluations are needed, in addition to greater consistency in the scope and methods that are used to monetise outcomes.