The effect of vaginal cylinder inhomogeneity on the HDR brachytherapy dose calculations using Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo analytically assess the heterogeneity effect of vaginal cylinders (VC) made of high‐density plastics on dose calculations, considering the prescription point (surface or 5 mm beyond the surface), and benchmark the accuracy of a commercial model‐based dose calculation (MBDC) algorithm using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.Methods and materialsThe GEANT4 MC code was used to simulate a commercial 192Ir HDR source and VC, with diameters ranging from 20 to 35 mm, inside a virtual water phantom. Standard plans were generated from a commercial treatment planning system [TPS—BrachyVision ACUROS (BV)] optimized for a treatment length of 5 cm through two dose calculation approaches: (1) assuming all the environment as water (i.e., Dw,w‐MC & Dw,w‐TG43) and (2) accounting for the heterogeneity of VC applicators (i.e., Dw,w‐App‐MC & Dw,w‐App‐MBDC). The compared isodose lines, and dose & energy difference maps were extracted for analysis. In addition, the dose difference on the peripheral surface, along the applicator and at middle of treatment length, as well as apical tip was evaluated.ResultsThe Dw,w‐App‐MC results indicated that the VC heterogeneity can cause a dose reduction of (up to) % 6.8 on average (for all sizes) on the peripheral surface, translating to 1 mm shrinkage of the isodose lines compared to Dw,w‐MC. In addition, the results denoted that BV overestimates the dose on the peripheral surface and apical tip of about 3.7% and 17.9%, respectively, (i.e., Dw,w‐App‐MBDC vs Dw,w‐App‐MC) when prescribing to the surface. However, the difference between the two were negligible at the prescription point when prescribing to 5 mm beyond the surface.ConclusionThe VCs’ heterogeneity could cause dose reduction when prescribing dose to the surface of the applicator, and hence increases the level of uncertainty. Thus, reviewing the TG43 results, in addition to ACUROS, becomes prudent, when evaluating the surface coverage at the apex.