The Mira discovery problem—Observations by David Fabricius in 1596 and 1609 (and by others before?): Positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period

Abstract

AbstractThe pulsating variable star Mira (o Ceti) was observed by David Fabricius (Frisia) in 1596 and 1609. We review suggested previous detections (e.g., China, Hipparchos). We analyze all Mira records from Fabricius in their historical context. Fabricius measured the separation of Mira to other stars to ±1.6−1.7′. From his texts, we derive a brightness (slightly brighter than Hamal) of ca. 1.9±0.1 mag and a color index B‐V1.3−1.4 mag (‘like Mars’) for 1596 Aug 3 (Jul.). Mira started to fainten 19 days later and was observed until mid/late Oct. We show why such a red star cannot be followed by the naked eye until ca. 6 mag: For Mira's color at disappearance and altitude from Frisia, the limit is reduced by ca. 1.0 mag. Since Fabricius connected the Mira brightening with the close‐by prograde Jupiter, he re‐detected it only 12 years later, probably shortly before a relatively bright maximum—discoveries are strongly affected by biases. A Mira period of 330.2 days is consistent with both the oldest data (from Fabricius 1596 to Hevelius 1660) and the most current data (VSX 2004–2023), so that we see no evidence for secular period or phase shifts. (We also present Fabricius' observations of P Cygni in 1602.)