Affiliation:
1. University of Tasmania Hobart Australia
2. Calvary Lenah Valley Hospital Hobart Australia
Abstract
AbstractPurpose of reviewAdults living with intellectual disability experience higher rates of preventable adverse medication events across the medicine pathway compared to their peers without disability.Source of informationThe Medication Safety Standard, developed by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, describes systems and strategies to ensure that clinicians and health organisations safely prescribe, dispense, administer appropriate medications to informed patients, and monitor their use.Key findingsOptimal application of the Medication Safety Standard for this population requires the development of reasonable adjustments to its action which take into account the barriers to safe medication management experienced by them in hospital settings. Design of such reasonable adjustments is influenced by consideration of the experiences of medicine management within with people living with intellectual disability, with intellectual disability, the roles of disability supports, and the disability‐health sector interface in relation to medication management.ConclusionThis review describes the formulation of a range of practice point reasonable adjustments to the usual clinical processes, content, knowledge, and organisation required in application of the Medication Safety Standard for adult patients living with intellectual disability.
Reference63 articles.
1. Australian Commission of Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC).National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 2nd edition. Sydney: ACSQHC;2021. Available from . Accessed 6 May 2023.
2. Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department
3. Patients' experiences in Australian hospitals: A systematic review of evidence;Harrison R;Aust Health Rev,2016
4. ACSQHC.Vital signs 2017:The state of safety and quality in Australian health care. Sydney: ACSQHC;2017.
5. Drug administration errors in an institution for individuals with intellectual disability: an observational study