Affiliation:
1. Design Division Taisei Corporation Tokyo Japan
2. Department of Graduate School of Advanced Sci. and Eng. University of Hiroshima Hiroshima Japan
3. Department of Architecture Graduate School of Eng. University of Kobe Kobe Japan
4. Nuclear Facility Division Taisei Corporation Tokyo Japan
Abstract
AbstractIn recent seismic analyses, it is considered that the structural damping ratio should be treated as independent of frequency, for safety side estimation. Therefore, frequency‐insensitive damping is required for realistic seismic simulations. This paper investigates the performance of various sparse matrix damping models (extended Raleigh, capped viscous and uniform damping) in the inelastic seismic analysis of a 35‐story moment‐frame steel building. These sparse matrix damping models were compared with Rayleigh, tangent Rayleigh, and Wilson‐Penzien (modal) damping models to provide insight into damping models suitable for large‐scale inelastic response history analysis (RHA). First, the necessity of frequency‐insensitive damping in large‐scale analysis is illustrated via numerical simulations. Then, the vibration characteristics with simultaneous inputs of horizontal and vertical ground motion are analyzed using the abovementioned damping schemes, and their results are compared. The comparisons are analyzed by focusing on horizontal displacement/acceleration, story drift angle, beam‐end ductility factor, the amplitude due to beam vibration, and the associated vertical acceleration. Finally, the computation speeds are compared. As a result, it is shown that although these sparse matrix damping models are practically useful, they are not yet sufficient and present challenges.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献