Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Author:

Vergote S.1ORCID,De Bie F. R.1,Duffy J. M. N.2,Bosteels J.1,Benachi A.34,Power B.5,Meijer F.6,Hedrick H. L.7,Fernandes C. J.8,Reiss I. K. M.9,De Coppi P.11011,Lally K. P.12,Deprest J. A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

2. Department of Women and Children's Health King's College London London UK

3. Service de Gynécologie–Obstétrique Hôpital Antoine–Béclère, AP–HP Clamart France

4. Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Hernie de Coupole Diaphragmatique Hôpital Antoine–Béclère, AP–HP Clamart France

5. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Charity (CDH UK) King's Lynn UK

6. PlatformCHD Arnhem The Netherlands

7. Department of Surgery Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA USA

8. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA

9. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

10. Department of Specialist Neonatal and Pediatric Surgery Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children London UK

11. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Institute of Child Health University College London London UK

12. Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital Houston TX USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method.MethodsAn international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, patient representatives, researchers and methodologists guided the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes were collected through a systematic review of the literature and entered into a two‐round online Delphi survey. A call was made for stakeholders with experience of congenital diaphragmatic hernia to review the list and score outcomes based on their perceived relevance. Outcomes that fulfilled the consensus criteria defined a priori were discussed subsequently in online breakout meetings. Results were reviewed in a consensus meeting, during which the core outcome set was defined. Finally, the definitions, measurement methods and aspirational outcomes were defined in online and in‐person definition meetings by a selection of 45 stakeholders.ResultsOverall, 221 stakeholders participated in the Delphi survey and 198 completed both rounds. Fifty outcomes met the consensus criteria and were discussed and rescored by 78 stakeholders in the breakout meetings. During the consensus meeting, 93 stakeholders agreed eventually on eight outcomes, which constituted the core outcome set. Maternal and obstetric outcomes included maternal morbidity related to the intervention and gestational age at delivery. Fetal outcomes included intrauterine demise, interval between intervention and delivery and change in lung size in utero around the time of the intervention. Neonatal outcomes included neonatal mortality, pulmonary hypertension and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Definitions and measurement methods were formulated by 45 stakeholders, who also added three aspirational outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation and use of pulmonary vasodilators at discharge.ConclusionsWe developed with relevant stakeholders a core outcome set for studies evaluating perinatal interventions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Its implementation should facilitate the comparison and combination of trial results, enabling future research to better guide clinical practice. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3