Australasian genetic counselors' attitudes toward disability and prenatal testing: Findings from a cross‐sectional survey

Author:

Yanes Tatiane1ORCID,Nathan Vaishnavi12,Wallingford Courtney1,Faragher Rhonda3,Nankervis Karen3,Jacobs Chris2,Vassos Maria3,Boyle Fran4,Carroll Annemaree3,Smith Simon456,McInerney‐Leo Aideen1

Affiliation:

1. Dermatology Research Centre Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Graduate School of Health University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. School of Education The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland Queensland Australia

5. ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractDiagnostic genetic testing and non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for conditions associated with disability are becoming increasingly available to consumers. This genetic information can be used in the disability setting to inform factors such as prognosis, management, and reproductive decision‐making. Genetic counselors (GCs) play an important role in the provision of genetic testing and NIPT, and their attitudes toward disability can influence how genetic information is communicated and shape patients' responses. This study aimed to evaluate and describe Australasian GCs' experience with and attitudes toward disabilities to identify potential biases and training needs. A cross‐sectional survey was distributed to 400 GCs registered with the Human Genetics Society of Australasia. Of the 106 respondents (participation rate: 26%), a significantly greater proportion were more comfortable interacting with individuals with physical disability as compared to intellectual disability (p < 0.001). GCs with personal experiences with disabilities reported significantly greater comfort interacting with people with intellectual disability than those without experience (p = 0.012). Qualitative analysis revealed discomfort was less reflective of bias than inexperience and apprehension about communicating disrespectfully. GCs believed people with disabilities experience discrimination and that having a disability could make a person stronger, wiser, and more motivated. Most GCs viewed prenatal testing for disabilities positively as it allowed for decisions regarding continuing the pregnancy and/or provided opportunity to prepare. Challenges identified for prenatal counseling included negative societal attitudes and the low visibility of disability. GCs felt that ‘personal beliefs’ was the primary factor influencing the decision to terminate a pregnancy affected by disability. These findings highlight important education and training needs for GCs to improve preparedness and comfort when communicating with people with a disability.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference60 articles.

1. Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling. (2019).Standards of accreditation for graduate programs in genetic counseling. Retrieved November 15 2022 fromhttps://www.gceducation.org/get‐accredited/

2. Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3