Racial and ethnic differences in perceptions of germline or somatic DNA sequencing among patients with advanced prostate, urothelial, or kidney cancer

Author:

Bergerot Cristiane Decat1ORCID,Philip Errol J.2,Malhotra Jasnoor3,Bergerot Paulo Gustavo1,Castro Daniela V.4,Govindarajan Ameish4,Salgia Sabrina5,Salgia Meghan6,Salgia Nicholas7,Hsu JoAnn4,Meza Luis4,Zengin Zeynep B.4,Liu Sandy8,Chehrazi‐Raffle Alex4,Tripathi Abhishek4,Dorff Tanya4,Pal Sumanta4

Affiliation:

1. Oncoclinicas Brasília Brazil

2. University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA

3. Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA

4. Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA

5. Western University of Health Sciences Pomona California USA

6. University of Miami School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

7. Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Buffalo New York USA

8. Department of Medical Oncology City of Hope Orange County Medical Center Irvine California USA

Abstract

AbstractWe sought to determine racial and ethnic differences in perceptions (quality of communication, expectations, and concerns) of germline or somatic DNA sequencing (genomic profiling). Patients with prostate, urothelial, or kidney cancer were surveyed using a questionnaire that assessed previous experience, beliefs, expectations, and concerns regarding genomic profiling. Descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests were used to identify factors associated with patients' perceptions of genomic profiling. A total of 150 consecutive patients were enrolled. The majority were male (74%) with a mean age of 68 years old. Most patients underwent somatic testing (54%), 24% undertook germline testing, and 21% undertook both tests. Significant differences were found across racial and/or ethnicity concerning factors that could have influenced patients' decision to pursue genomic profiling, including ability to guide the type of treatment (White: 54.1% vs. other ethnic groups: 43.9%, p = 0.04) and potential to improve treatment response (White: 10.1% vs. other ethnic groups: 22.0%, p = 0.04). Other ethnic group of patients were more concerned about learning that the cancer was less treatable or aggressive (43.8% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01) and anxious about what would be learnt from genomic profiling (34.4% vs. 21.3, p = 0.01) as compared to White patients. Our findings reinforce the importance of developing culturally tailored education to help patients participate actively in decisions about genomic profiling.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3