How do women talk about self‐funded breast cancer genetic testing?: Small stories and stance‐taking strategies

Abstract

AbstractGenetic testing for breast cancer genes is an experience which is inextricably linked with health communication practices and the broader social context in which it occurs. Linguistic approaches can provide perspective on how women seeking self‐funded BRCA1/2 gene testing represent their experiences, knowledge, roles, choices and emotions through the way they talk. A discursive constructionist epistemology and narrative theoretical framework informed the applied linguistics methodology. Analysis of ‘small stories’ and stance‐taking was performed on eight transcripts of audio‐recorded telephone interviews with women at low to moderate risk of carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who self‐funded genetic testing. We found a high prevalence of ‘small stories’ including accounts of events, hypotheticals, habitual narratives, and stories which combined multiple genres. Stance‐taking was a means by which participants constructed personal identities in the conversational context, such as that of a responsible person. Via stance‐taking strategies, participants also actively negotiated the conversational agenda, for example expressing different degrees of alignment with the interviewer's orientation towards emotions. This study provides a basis for recognizing linguistic markers in genetic counseling interactions about genetic testing for breast cancer genes. Enhanced awareness of client language choice, and the ways in which small stories and stance can signify the client's evaluation of experience and choices, alignment with the genetic counselor's questions/statements, and investment in the conversation, has potential to improve the therapeutic interaction.