Risk factors for the development of refeeding syndrome in adults: A systematic review

Author:

Zheng Ping1,Chen Yilin2,Chen Feng3,Zhou Min4,Xie Caixia5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing PengZhou People's Hospital Chengdu Sichuan China

2. Department of Nursing ChengFei Hospital Chengdu Sichuan China

3. Department of Oncology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu Sichuan China

4. Department of Urology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu Sichuan China

5. Department of Nursing, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China

Abstract

AbstractIdentifying patients with a particularly high risk of refeeding syndrome (RFS) is essential for taking preventive measures. To guide the development of clinical decision‐making and risk prediction models or other screening tools for RFS, increased knowledge of risk factors is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for the development of RFS. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 until March 2023. Studies investigating demographic, clinical, drug use, laboratory, and/or nutrition factors for RFS were considered. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Of 1589 identified records, 30 studies were included. Thirty‐three factors associated with increased risk of RFS after multivariable adjustments were identified. The following factors were reported by two or more studies, with 0–1 study reporting null findings: a previous history of alcohol misuse, cancer, comorbid hypertension, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, low Glasgow coma scale score, the use of diuretics before refeeding, low baseline serum prealbumin level, high baseline level of creatinine, and enteral nutrition. The majority of the studies (20, 66.7%) were of high methodological quality. In conclusion, this systematic review informs on several risk factors for RFS in patients. To improve risk stratification and guide development of risk prediction models or other screening tools, further confirmation is needed because there were a small number of studies and a low number of high‐quality studies on each factor.

Funder

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3