An Integrated Algorithm for Differentiating Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy From Hypertensive Heart Disease

Author:

Kong Ling‐cong1ORCID,Wu Lian‐ming2,Wang Zi1,Liu Chang3,He Ben4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital School of Medicine Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai China

2. Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital School of Medicine Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai China

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health Sichuan University Chengdu China

4. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University Xuhui Distinct, Shanghai China

Abstract

BackgroundDifferentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from hypertensive heart disease (HHD) is challenging.PurposeTo identify differences between HCM and HHD on a patient basis using MRI.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationA total of 219 subjects, 148 in phase I (baseline data and algorithm development: 75 HCM, 33 HHD, and 40 controls) and 71 in phase II (algorithm validation: 56 HCM and 15 HHD).Field Strength/SequenceContrast‐enhanced inversion‐prepared gradient echo and cine‐balanced steady‐state free precession sequences at 3.0 T.AssessmentMRI parameters assessed included left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end systolic and end diastolic volumes (LVESV and LVEDV), mean maximum LV wall thickness (MLVWT), LV global longitudinal and circumferential strain (GRS, GLS, and GCS), and native T1. Parameters, which were significantly different between HCM and HHD in univariable analysis, were entered into a principal component analysis (PCA). The selected components were then introduced into a multivariable regression analysis to model an integrated algorithm (IntA) for screening the two disorders. IntA performance was assessed for patients with and without LGE in phase I (development) and phase II (validation).Statistical TestsUnivariable regression, PCA, receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsDerived IntA formulation included LVEF, LVESV, LVEDV, MLVWT, and GCS. In LGE‐positive subjects in phase l, the cutoff point of IntA ≥81 indicated HCM (83% sensitivity and 91% specificity), with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.900. In LGE‐negative subjects, a higher possibility of HCM was indicated by a cutoff point of IntA ≥84 (100% sensitivity and 82% specificity), with an AUC of 0.947. Validation of IntA in phase II resulted in an AUC of 0.846 in LGE‐negative subjects and 0.857 in LGE‐positive subjects.Data ConclusionA per‐patient‐based IntA algorithm for differentiating HCM and HHD was generated from MRI data and incorporated FT, LGE and morphologic parameters.Evidence Level3.Technical EfficacyStage 2.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3