Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews

Published:2024-09 Issue:3 Volume:20 Page:
ISSN:1891-1803
Container-title:Campbell Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:Campbell Systematic Reviews

Author:

MacDonald Heather¹^ORCID,Comer Cozette²,Foster Margaret³,Labelle Patrick R.⁴,Marsalis Scott⁵,Nyhan Kate⁶,Premji Zahra⁷,Rogers Morwenna⁸^ORCID,Splenda Ryan⁹,Stansfield Claire¹⁰,Young Sarah⁹

Affiliation:

1. MacOdrum Library Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. University Libraries, Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

3. Medical Sciences Library Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

4. University of Ottawa, Library Ottawa Ontario Canada

5. University Libraries, University of Minnesota‐Twin Cities Minneapolis Minnesota USA

6. Cushing/Whitney Medical Library Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA

7. Advanced Research Services University of Victoria Libraries Victoria British Columbia Canada

8. NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC) University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK

9. Carnegie Mellon University Libraries Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

10. EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractThis guide outlines general issues in searching for studies; describes the main sources of potential studies; and discusses how to plan the search process, design, and carry out search strategies, manage references found during the search process and document and report the search process.

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cl2.1433

Reference128 articles.

1. Librarian Co-Authored Systematic Reviews are Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared to Systematic Reviews with Acknowledgement of Librarians or No Participation by Librarians

2. Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. (2014).Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews: AHRQ publication no. 10(14)‐EHC063‐EF.http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/CER-Methods-Guide-140109.pdf

3. Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions

4. Health economic evaluations: How to find them

5. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis