Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID‐19‐associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A nationwide analysis

Author:

Watanabe Atsuyuki1ORCID,Malik Aaqib2,Aikawa Tadao34ORCID,Briasoulis Alexandros5,Kuno Toshiki67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Mount Sinai Beth Israel New York New York USA

2. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center New York Medical College Valhalla New York USA

3. Department of Cardiology Hokkaido Cardiovascular Hospital Sapporo Japan

4. Department of Radiology Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center Saitama Japan

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA

6. Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

7. Division of Cardiology, Jacobi Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for COVID‐19‐associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to elucidate the association between ECMO and mortality in patients with COVID‐19‐associated ARDS in the nationwide setting. United States National Inpatient Sample was used to identify mechanically ventilated adults for COVID‐19 with ARDS. We divided them into three groups according to the use of ECMO (i.e., no‐ECMO, venovenous [VV]‐ECMO, and venoarterial [VA]‐ECMO). The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the total costs during hospitalization. We performed a stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and severity. We included 68 795 (mean age [SD]: 63.5 [0.1]), 3280 (mean age [SD]: 48.7 [0.5]), and 340 (mean age [SD]: 43.3 [2.1]) patients who received no‐, VV‐, and VA‐ECMO, respectively. The logistic regression analysis did not show significant associations between the use of VV‐/VA‐ECMO and mortality (adjusted odds ratio with no‐ECMO as reference [95% confidence interval]: 1.03 [0.86−1.24] and 1.18 [0.64−2.15], respectively). While LOS was longest with VV‐ECMO, the total costs were highest with VA‐ECMO. In conclusion, our study found no association between the use of ECMO and mortality of COVID‐19‐associated ARDS in the nationwide setting.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Virology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3