Factors Associated with Research Productivity and National Institutes of Health Funding in Academic Otology

Abstract

ObjectivesBibliometrics, such as the Hirsch index (h‐index) and the more recently developed relative citation ratio (RCR), are utilized to evaluate research productivity. Our study evaluates demographics, research productivity, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in academic otology.MethodsAcademic otologists were identified, and their demographics were collected using institutional faculty profiles (N = 265). Funding data were obtained using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Reports Database. The h‐index was calculated using Scopus and mean (m‐RCR) and weighted RCR (w‐RCR) were calculated using the NIH iCite tool.ResultsH‐index (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10–1.27, p < 0.001), but not m‐RCR (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 0.97–2.31, p = 0.069) or w‐RCR (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.00, p = 0.231), was associated with receiving NIH funding. Men had greater h‐index (16 vs. 9, p < 0.001) and w‐RCR (51.8 vs. 23.0, p < 0.001), but not m‐RCR (1.3 vs. 1.3, p = 0.269) than women. Higher academic rank was associated with greater h‐index and w‐RCR (p < 0.001). Among assistant professors, men had greater h‐index than women (9.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.025). At career duration 11–20 years, men had greater h‐index (14.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.009) and w‐RCR (52.7 vs. 25.8, p = 0.022) than women.ConclusionThe h‐index has a strong relationship with NIH funding in academic otology. Similar h‐index, m‐RCR, and w‐RCR between men and women across most academic ranks and career durations suggests production of similarly impactful research. The m‐RCR may correct some deficiencies of time‐dependent bibliometrics and its consideration in academic promotion and research funding allocation may promote representation of women in otology.Level of EvidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 134:3786–3794, 2024